The Morphosyntactic Distribution and Functions of Demonstratives in Shinyiha

Devet Goodness

Abstract


This paper examines the morphosyntactic distribution and functions of
demonstratives in Shinyiha [M23]. Specifically, the paperexamines the
forms, distribution and use of demonstratives in Shinyiha. The data
werecollected through elicitation. The findingsindicate that
demonstratives in this language constitute a class that is complex in
terms of form, function and distribution. The findings also indicate that
there is no single rule governing the distribution of demonstratives in
this language. The study reveals that, in most cases, the form of the
demonstrative in Shinyiha depends on the form of the noun class prefix,
preprefix or the root of the head noun.As regards the functions, the study
shows that demonstratives in Shinyiha perform various functions
ranging from sentential to the discourse level.The findings also show
that,in an unmarked order,the demonstrative occurs postnominally (N
DEM) to perform deictic functionwhile,in a marked order, the
demonstrative occurs prenominally (DEM N) to express definiteness,
specificity and focus


Full Text:

 Subscribers Only

References


Abney, S. P. (1987). English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect.

PhD Thesis, MIT.

Alexiadou, A. L. Haegeman, & Staurou, M. (2007). Noun Phrase in

the Generative Perspective : Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Ashton, E. (1944). Swahili Grammar including Intonation. London:

Longman Gree & Co.

Batibo, H. M. (1985). Le Kesukuma (langue Bantue de Tanzanie)

Phonologgie Morphologie. Paris Center de Rech et de

Documentation Universitarie (credu).

Cornish, F. (1999). Anaphora, Discourse and Understanding:

Evidence from English and French: Oxford: Oxford

University Press & International African Institute.

Carstens, V. (1991). The Morphology and Syntax of Determiner

Pharses in Kiswahili.UCLA PhD Thesis.

Carstens, V. (1993). On Nominal Morphology & D P Structure. In S.

Mchombo (ed.). Theoretical Aspects of Bantu Grammar .

Carlifonia: CSL1Publications.

Carstens, V. (2008). Nominal Morphology and DP Structure. In S.

Mchombo (ed.). Theoretical Aspects of Bantu Grammar.

Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Cinque, G. (2005). Driving Greenberg's Universal 20 and its

Exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(3): 315-332.

Dianne, F. A. G.& Samwel, M.(2017). A Grammar of Moloko, African

Languages Grammars and Dictionaries . Berlin: Language

Science Press.

Diessel, H. (1999). The Morphosyntax of Demonstratives in

Synchrony and Diachrony. Linguist: Typology 3:1-49.

Dixon, R. M. W. (2003). Demonstratives. A Cross Linguistic

Typology. Studies in Language , 27(1):61-112.

Frank, M. (1972). Modern English: A Practical Reference Guide. New

Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.

Giusti, G. (1996). Is there a Focus n and a Topic P in the Noun

Phrase Structure? l6:105-128.

Givon, T. (2001). Syntax, an Introduction, Vol.1, Amsterdam &

Philadelphia: John Benjamnins Publishing Company.

Greenberg, J. (1963). Some Universals of Grammar with Particular

Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements. Universals

of Language , 73-113

Guardiano, C. (2012). Demonstratives, Word Order and the DP

between Syntax and Semantics: Cross-linguistic Remarks:

Studies in Greek Linguistics , 32:100-115.

| The Morphosyntactic Distribution and Functions of Demonstration in Shinyiha

Huang, Y. (2000). Anaphora, A Cross Linguistic Approach. Oxford.

Oxford University Press.

Hyman, L. M. & Katamba F. X. (1993). The Augment in Luganda:

Syntax or Pragmatics. In S. Mchombo (ed.). Theoretical

Aspects of Bantu Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSL1.

Johnston, H. J. (1919). Comparative Study of Bantu and Semi-Bantu

Languages. OxfordUniversity Press.

Levinson, S. C. (2004). Deixis and Pragmatics. In L. Horn & G. Ward

(eds.). The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Mkude. D. J. (1974). A Study of Kikaguru Syntax with Special

Reference to Transformational History of Sentences with

Permitted Subject and Object. London: University of London.

Murphy, R. (2009). English Grammar in Use. Cambridge: Cambridge

University press.

Navarreta, C. (2004). Resolving Individual and Abstract Anaphora in

Texts and Dialogues. Proceedings of the 20th International

Conference on Computational Linguistics, Association for

computational Linguistics. Stroudsburg, PA, USA, Article 23.

DOI 14311511220355.1220389 (Last consulted 29th March

.

Ndomba, R. (2017). The Definite Article in Swahili. Journal of

Linguistics and Language in Education, 11(2).

Nicolle, S. (2004). Concise Grammar of Digo Language.

Nicolle, S. (2007). Metarepresentational Demonstratives in Digo. In

A. Rand, N. A. Nilsen & O. Keja (eds.). Interpreting

Utterances: Pragmatics and its Interfaces: Essays in Honour

of Thorstain Frethein. Oslo: Novus: 127-146.

Puturusi, M. (2016). The Students Difficulties in Using

Demonstratives. Journal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra

Inggris, 5(90).

Radford, A. (2004), Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of

English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Roberts, I. (2011). FOFC in DP: Universal 20 and the Nature of

Demonstratives. MS. In S. A. Mchombo (ed.). Theoretical

Aspects of Bantu Grammar . Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Rugemalira, J. M. (2007). The Structure of the Noun Phrase. SOAS

Working Papers in Linguistics , 15:135-148.

Shobirin, R. M. (2008). Basic English Grammar . Jakarta: PT Tonga

Pustaka.

Journal of Linguistics and Language in Education Volume 14, Number 2 (2020) |127

Sideeg, A. (2016). Key Arguments for the Determiner Phrase

Hypothesis. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences,

(2): 18-25.

Valois, D. (1991). The Internal Syntax of DP. UCLA PhD Thesis


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 [ISSN 0856-9965 (Print)]