Students’ Intelligence and Causal Attributions for Academic Under-achievement among Secondary School Students in Tanzania
Abstract
This study investigated how students make attributions when explaining their academic under-achievement in secondary schools in Tanzania. A survey was conducted using an attribution scale in the Likert format and was administered to 414 students. In externalisations and internalisations, there was a statistically significant difference in mean scores for externalisations at p<.001. Also, a significant difference was found in the externalisation between high and low achievers at p<.001. Furthermore, it was also found that male students externalise more than their female counterparts, the difference being significant at p≤.05. Whereas females internalised more than males, the difference was significant at p=.001. Self-perceived ‘intelligent’ students externalised more than those less intelligent self-perceived students, their difference being statistically significant at p≤.05. It was also found that parental occupations did not influence students’ attributions. These attributions are true human characteristics that vary from one group to another. In the case of academic under-achievement in Tanzania, educational actors have to notice this variation in order to help students with motivational problems.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Feldman, R.S. (2005). Essentials of understanding psychology. Boston: McGraw Hill.
Fincham, F., & Hewstone, M. (2001). Attribution theory and research: From basic to applied. M.Hewstone & W. Stroebe (Eds.).Introduction to social psychology. (pp.198-238).350 Main Street: Blackwell publishing Ltd.
Forsyth, D.R.(1980).The functions of attributions. Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol.43, (2) 184-189.
Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From Acts to Dispositions: The Attribution process in person perception. L. Berkowitz (Ed), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2, pp 219-66.
Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution Theory in Social Psychology. D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192-238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press
Kerlinger, F.N. (1973). Foundations of Behavioural Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Wiston.
Malim, T., & Birch, A. (1998). Introductory psychology. New York: Palgrave.
Ministry of Education and Culture (2003).Results analysis for Tanzania mainland secondary schools and seminaries (CSEE) 2002.Dar es Salaam: MOEC
Mbwambo, E.E. (2005).Teacher motivation and students academic performance in secondary schools. Unpublished MA (Education) Dissertation: University of Dar es Salaam.
Moshi, S. (2009, December 28). Bad examination results: Who to blame? The Guardian, Tanzania. p.9.
Mvungi,M.M.(1982).Relationship between performance in instructional medium and performance in selected school subjects in Tanzanian secondary schools. Unpublished PhD Thesis: University of Dar es Salaam.
Mwendapole,J. (2010,January 14).Theluthi Wafeli Kidato cha Pili.Nipashe, Tanzania, p.3.
Myers, D.G. (2005). Social Psychology. Boston: McGraw -Hill.
Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows. (3rd ed.). McGraw Hill: Open University Press.
Peterson, C, & Steen, T.A (2005). Optimistic explanatory style. Synyder,C.R & Lopez,S. Handbook of Positive Psychology. London: Oxford University Press.
Rotriguez, R., & Tollefson, N. (1987). Consequences of Costa Rican teachers’ attributions for students’ failure. Instructional Science, Vol.16, (4), 381-387.
Spata, A. V. (2003). Research methods: Science and diversity. New York: John Wiley
& Sons.
UNICEF (2001). Situation analysis for children in Tanzania. Dar es Salaam: UNICEF.
URT (2009). Basic Education Statistics in Tanzania 2005-2009, National Data. Dar es Salaam: Ministry of Education and Vocational Training.
URT (2002). Waraka wa Elimu Na. 2: Kupandisha Kiwango cha Kufaulu Mtihani wa Kidato cha Pili.Wizara ya Elimu na Utamaduni.
Weiner, B. (1986). An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion. New York: Springer Verlag.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.