The Cognitive Motivation for the Use of Metonymy in Kuria and Iraqw Personal Names

Nicholous Asheli

Abstract


It has been commonly held that metonymy is an aspect of literary works; acting as figures of speech. There are scholars who consider metonymy to be a technique that is employed by someone experienced in literary works. In Cognitive Linguistics, however, metonymy is considered to be part of human cognition. That means people use metonymy without any effort because it is part of the mental function. They use it even without being aware that they are using it. This paper attempts to demonstrate the cognitive motivation for the prevalent use of metonymy in Kuria and Iraqw personal names. It is argued, in the paper, that common use of metonymy in the two languages’ personal names demonstrates coincidental relationship between birth and place, circumstance and time. It is concluded that personal names in the two languages studied are bestowed based on some cognitive principles which name-givers may not be aware of but they use them because such principles are part of their cognition. It is also concluded that metonymy is as well governed by construal operations which also have a cognitive basis.

Key words: metonymy, personal names, cognition, cognitive linguistics


Full Text:

PDF

References


Agyekum, K. (2006). The Sociolinguistic of Akan Personal Names. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 206–235.

Akinola, O. A. (2014). Communicative Role of Yoruba Names.

International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 65–72.

Croft, W & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Cruse, A. (2011). Meaning in Language: An Introduction to

Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Crystal, D. (1997). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language (2nd

ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Evans, V. (2007). A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh:

Edinburgh University Press.

Guan, J. (2009). The Cognitive Nature of Metonymy and its Implications. English Language Teaching, 179–183.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What

Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we Live by. Chicago: The

University of Chicago Press.

Schmid, H. (2007). The Notion of Entrenchment and Salience in

Cognitive Linguistics.

In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (eds.).The Oxford Handbook of

Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 118–

Taylor, J. R. (2003). Linguistic Categorization. Oxford: Oxfor University Press.

Ungerer, F. & Schmid, H. J. (1996). An Introduction to Cognitive

Linguistics. London: Longman.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 [ISSN 0856-9965 (Print)]