Match and Mismatch between Pre-Primary Teachers’ Beliefs and Classroom Instruction in Teaching and Learning to Read Kiswahili in Tanzania: Implications for Teacher Education

Richard Shukia

Abstract


Teachers’ beliefs have the potential of influencing teachers’ instructional decisions and/or even accept, resist or renegotiate the mandated curriculum intentions. Yet, knowledge about these relations in Tanzania’s pre-primary education is largely lacking. This study sought to narrow this gap of knowledge by exploring pre-primary teachers’ beliefs about learning and teaching to read Kiswahili in Tanzania, and the extent to which these beliefs are related to classroom instructional practices and curriculum intentions. The study was informed by a qualitative hermeneutic-phenomenology methodology. Twenty-one pre-primary teachers were involved in this study. Of these, three were males and 18 were females. Of the participants, six had primary teacher education background whereas two had attended a one-year pre-school training course. Empirical materials were generated over a period of six months using 21 semi-structured interviews, 12 classroom observations, 12 post-observation video-stimulated interviews, and content analysis of lesson plans and curriculum. The study findings reveal that teachers’ beliefs about teaching to read Kiswahili revolve around direct and systematic phonics instruction and integration of reading and writing activities. The findings further demonstrate that there was both match and mismatch between the teachers’ beliefs, their instructional practices and curriculum intentions. Thus, the study recommends the provision of on-going reflective teacher in-service training, fostering of teacher effective participation in curriculum development process, and doubling of efforts aimed to address contextual factors, which interrupt classroom instructional practices and affect the relationship between teachers’ beliefs and curriculum intentions.

 

Keywords: Teachers’ beliefs, learning to read difficulties, pre-primary teachers


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abadzi, H. (2013). Literacy for all in 100 days? A research-based strategy for fast progress in low-income countries. Global Partnership for Education.

Afflerbach, P. P. & Cho, B. (2011).The classroom assessment of reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. Birr Moje, & P. P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. IV (pp. 487-514). New York: Routledge.

Ainsworth, M., Ortlieb, E., Cheek, E., Pate, R., & Fetters, C. (2012). First grade teachers’ perception and implementation of a semi-scripted reading curriculum. Language and Education, 26(1), 77-90. DOI: 10.1080/09500782.2011.618540.

Alcock, K. J., Nokes, K., Ngowi, F., Musabi, C., McGregor, S., Mbise, A., Mandali, R., Bundy, D. & Baddeley, A. (2000).The development of reading tests for use in a regularly spelt language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21(4), 525-555.

Bhalalusesa, E., Westbrook, J., Lussier, K., Sima, R., Qorro, M., Katabaro, J., Matonya, M., Tiboroha, J., Nzima, I., Croft, W. A. &Kimani, C. (2011).The Preparation of Teachers in Reading and Maths and its Influence on Practices in Tanzania Primary Schools, Tanzania’s Country Report, July 2011. University of Sussex: Centre for International Education.

Borg, S. (2003). Teacher Cognition in Language Teaching: A Review of Research on What Language Teachers Think, Know, Believe, and Do. Language Teaching, 36 (2), 81 – 109.

Borg, S. (2006). Teacher Cognition and Language Education: Research and Practice. London: Continuum.

Brown, C. A. & Cooney, T. J. (1982). Research on Teacher Education: A Philosophical Orientation. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 15 (4), 13-18.

Chabbott, C. (2006) Accelerating early grades reading in high priority EFA Countries: A desk review, U.S. Agency for International Development.

Clark, C. M. & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255-296). New York: Macmillan.

Cross, R. (2010). Language teaching as sociocultural activity: Rethinking language teacher practice. The Modern Language Journal, 94 (iii), 434-452: DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01058.x0026-7902/10.

Dubeck, M. M., Jukes, M. C. H. &Okello, G. (2012). Early Primary Literacy Instruction in Kenya. Comparative Education Review, 56 (1), 48-68.

Duffy, G. G. & Anderson, L. (1984).Teachers’ theoretical orientations and the real classroom. Reading Psychology, 5 (1-2), 97-104.

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Retrieved April 20, 2014, http://lchc.ucsd.edu/mca/Paper/Engestrom/Learning-by-Expanding.pdf

Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38 (1), 47-65.

Feng, J. (1990). Match or mismatch: The relationship between teachers’ beliefs about reading and their reading instructional practices. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 341 966.

HakiElimu. (2016). The Impact of the Implementation of Fee-Free Basic Education in Tanzania. Dar es Salaam: Haki Elimu.

Health, C., Hindmarsh, J. & Luff, P. (2011).Video in qualitative research: Analysing social interaction in everyday life. London: Sage.

Harste, J. C. & Burke, C. L. (1977). A new hypothesis for reading teacher research: Both the teaching and learning of reading is theoretically based. In P.D. Pearson (Ed.), Reading: Theory, research and practice (pp. 32-40). Clemson, S.C.: National Reading Conference.

Kagan, D. M. (1992).Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27, 65-90.

Kastopoulou, A. (2005). Teachers’ Beliefs about the Teaching of Reading in Early Years Settings (PhD Thesis). University of Warwick, Coventry.

Mansour, N. (2009). Science Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices: Issues, Implications and Research Agenda. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4 (1), 25-48.

Mayo, J. (2010).A study of early childhood education teachers’ beliefs and practices about early literacy learning(PhD Thesis). Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia.

Ministry of Education and Vocational Training. (2005). Pre-primary education syllabus for pre-primary schools in Tanzania. Dar es Salaam: Government Press.

Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Curriculum Studies, 19 (4), 317-328.

Ngorosho, D. (2011). Reading and Writing Ability in Relation to Home Environment: A Study in Primary Education in Rural Tanzania. Child Indicators Research, 4, 369-388. DOI: 10.1007/s12187-010-9089-8.

Orafi, S. M. S. & Borg, S. (2009). Intentions and realities in implementing communicative curriculum reform. System, 37, 243–253.

Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62 (3), 307-332.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3nd ed.).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Research Triangle Institute International. (2011). Early grade reading assessment: Applications and interventions to improve basic literacy. Edited by A. Gove & A. Wetterberd. RTI Press.

Snow, C. E., Burns, S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children: Report of Committee on the Prevention of Reading Difficulties in Young Children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Uwezo. (2010). Are our children learning? Annual learning assessment report Tanzania. Uwezo Tanzania. Retrieved from http://www.uwezo.net.

Westwood, P., Knight, B. A., & Redden, E. (1997). Assessing beliefs about literacy acquisition: The development of the Teachers’ Beliefs about Literacy Questionnaire (TBALQ). Journal of Research in Reading, 20 (3), pp. 224-235.

Wilson, N. S. (2012). Uncovering teachers’ beliefs through the development of a vision statement. American Reading Forum Annual Yearbook [Online], Vol.32.

Zheng, H. (2009). A review of research on EFL pre-service teachers’ beliefs and practices. Journal of Cambridge Studies, 20 (1), 73-81.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.